|
Newsletters
June, 2005
MOLDS
AND MYCOTOXINS
OF CONCERN IN SWINE DIETS
This has been discussed
in previous Hormel Feed Newsletters, but is worth a
second look. Factors other than variation in nutrient
content can affect corn quality and its subsequent feeding
value. Under the right growing conditions, certain fungi
(molds) and mycotoxins can invade corn and pose potential
feeding problems. Mold spores are generally spread by
water and air and can come in contact with plants in
the field or with corn grain in storage facilities or
feeders. Mold or fungi contamination is the cause of
reduction in grain storage quality from a grading or
marketing standpoint. Consumption of corn grain that
contains only fungal growth generally will not harm
livestock. Instead, most problems result from consumption
of mycotoxins produced from specific fungi growing in
corn or mixed diets. Until a laboratory test proves
otherwise, the safe approach is to assume mycotoxins
are present in grain when mold growth appears.
The fungus that
can cause the majority of problems for Midwestern pork
producers is Fusarium. Fusarium molds can produce the
mycotoxins deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) and zearalenone.
Cool, wet weather conditions favor Fusarium growth,
whereas Aspergillus (mold that produces aflatoxin) grows
best in hot, humid weather and more often affects grains
grown in the Southeastern U.S. If mycotoxins problems
are suspected, it is vital to contact a qualified laboratory
and submit corn samples for analysis that best represent
the total volume of corn to be fed. The laboratory should
include both a qualitative and quantitative analysis
for mycotoxins. There is little research data available
to tell the exact degree of performance loss that should
be expected when varying levels of certain mycotoxins
are present in the diet. It is known that quite low
levels of mycotoxins can adversely affect swine performance.
Recommended maximum concentrations of vomitoxin, zearalenone
and aflatoxin in swine diets are present below.
| Pig |
Deoxynivalenol
ppm |
Zearalenone
ppm |
Aflatoxin
ppb |
|
| Breeding Herd |
1.0 |
2.0 |
100 |
| Young |
1.0 |
1.0 |
20 |
| Growing |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- -* |
| Finishing |
1.0 |
3.0 |
200 |
| Young Males |
1.0 |
3.0 |
- -* |
| Old Males |
1.0 |
3.0 |
- -* |
|
| *Concentrations not determined. |
|
Ref: 57th Minnesota Nutrition Conference Proceedings:
September,
1996: J. D. Hawton: University of Minnesota: Pages
269-294.
Predicting
Dry Matter Intake
In Dairy Cattle
Dry matter intake
is the single most important factor affecting milk production.
Many things can affect dry matter intake. They can be
categorized as dietary, environmental and physiological.
Underfeeding can affect health and/or performance while
overfeeding can result in increased feed costs. Cows
generally consume to meet their energy needs. Fill capacity
can limit the cows' ability to consume enough energy.
There are many equations
and/or rules of thumb for predicting dry matter intake.
Unfortunately, most apply to specific situations. One
equation that appears to work over a wider range of
situations is:
DMI = 0.02 (BwKg)
+ 0.33(4% FCM Kg)
BW = Body Weight; FCM = Fat Corrected
Milk; Kg = Kilogram; Kg = 2.2 pounds.
An example of the preceding equation is as follows:
Cow weight = 1350
pounds
(1350 / 2.2 = 614 kg)
4% FCM = 70 pounds
(70/2.2 = 32 kg)
- - - - - - -
DMI = .02(614) + .33(32)
DMI = 12.28 + 10.56
DMI = 22.84 Kg
DMI = 2.2 (22.84)
DMI = 50.25 pounds
Dietary factors that can affect
dry matter intake include: concentrate level, digestibility,
fat effects, forage particle size, forage type, moisture
content, neutral detergent fiber and protein content.
Environmental factors include: Barn/bunk design, feeding
frequency, photoperiod, and temperature.
Obviously, compounding factors can have an influence
on actual dry matter intake. As a result, a knowledge
of how the above factors affect dry matter intake should
be useful. Actual measurement of dry matter intake is
still the best measure.
Ref: 1993 Minnesota Nutrition Conference Proceedings,
Pg. 77.
PORCINE
MEAT & BONE MEAL
CONTINUES TO HAVE A DOLLAR
SAVINGS POTENTIAL IN SWINE DIETS
Porcine meat and bone meal can
be a valuable addition to swine diets in terms of both
performance and cost. Because of its' unique combination
of nutrients it can improve amino acid profiles, increase
energy levels and provide an alternative source of minerals.
When included in a least cost formulation for pigs
from 50 to 260 pounds, there is a potential savings
of around $0.72 per ton of complete feed with current
markets (6/7/05).
That number was obtained using
least-cost diets with a Hormel premix, dicalcium phosphate,
calcium carbonate, salt, corn, dehulled soybean meal,
55% porcine meat and bone meal and lysine. Meat and
bone meal was limited to a maximum of 5% of the total
diet. Such a diet will reduce the amount of dehulled
soybean meal, dicalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate
used. Lysine and energy levels wee kept the same. Porcine
meat and bone meal was trading for $255 per ton picked
up at the plant (Austin, MN or Fremont, NE) on June
7, 2005 in semi-load lots.
Dollar
Values Used for
Least-Cost Formulas
| VTM Swine Premix |
$55.89/cwt. |
| Lysine |
$78.00/cwt. |
| Corn |
$1.90/bu. |
| Dehulled Soybean Meal |
$210/ton |
| Salt |
$3.00/cwt. |
| 18.5% Dicalcium Phosphate |
$14.00/cwt. |
| Calcium Carbonate |
$2.00/cwt. |
For More Information
Contact:
Hormel Foods Corporation
Feed Division
1 Hormel Place
Austin, MN 55912
PH: 800-533-2228
Website: www.hormelfeeds.com
|